EQT

Environmental

Biodiversity and Land Impacts

PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED
PROMISES MADE
PROMISES DELIVERED

Topic Highlights

Fostering a healthy biodiversity contributes to productive and resilient ecosystems that form the web of life on which we depend for everything, from food, water, and medicine to a stable climate and economic growth. We take seriously our responsibility to prevent negative impacts on local biodiversity through each step of our operations.

  • We proactively planned projects to avoid and minimize biodiversity impacts through comprehensive site selection and pipeline routing, as well as desktop and field studies that focused on identifying sensitive environmental resources, slope stability, and erosion potential.
  • We worked closely with regulatory agencies, local communities, and landowners to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and landowner preferences intended to protect biodiversity and land resources.
  • We provided support to avoid and minimize impacts during construction through contractor training, onsite oversight and monitoring, and incident response.
  • We implemented mitigation measures aimed at restoring habitats and offsetting potential negative impacts, such as riparian plantings and bat box installation.

What We Are Doing

GRI 3-3
Management of material topic
GRI 304-1
11.4.2
Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas
GRI 304-2
11.4.3
Significant impacts of activities, products, and services on biodiversity
SASB EM-MD-160a.2
Percentage of land owned, leased, or operated within areas of protected conservation status or endangered species habitat
GRI 3-3
GRI 304-1
GRI 304-2
SASB EM-MD-160a.2

Land plays a vital role in our daily activities. We owned or leased approximately 2.1 million gross acres in our operating areas in 2024. The potential impacts of natural gas operations on biodiversity, habitats, and land are highly regulated and a primary focus for local communities, landowners, and many industry associations. We acknowledge that prevention of negative impacts on the surrounding landscape and local biodiversity from each step of our operations — including site design, development, operation, and decommissioning — is critical to building trust with our valued stakeholders and maintaining our commitment to environmental stewardship.

We aim to avoid, minimize, mitigate, and monitor impacts on the land and wildlife where we operate throughout the life cycle of a site or pipeline. As members of the Marcellus Shale Coalition and the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, we participate in working groups that focus on site planning, development, restoration, and other topics that foster land protection. Our Surface, Permitting, and Civil (SP&C) group works closely with our Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) team and leverages our EHS Management System throughout site permitting, monitoring, and decommissioning.

Our operational assets are sometimes located near or within legally protected lands such as federal- and state-owned lands, state parks and game lands, and county parks and recreation areas. We follow federal, state, and local regulations regarding species and habitat protection during operational activity near or within protected lands or areas of high biodiversity.

2024 Leased or Owned Acreage in Legally Protected Areas (km2)[1]

 Metric

Wetlands (km2)

Federal Land and Parks (km2)

Ohio

18.0

23.1

Pennsylvania

83.4

851.5

West Virginia

23.1

124.9

Other States

0

0

Total

124.6

999.5

km2: square kilometers

 

Mountain Valley Pipeline Restoration Efforts

During 2024, EQT completed restoration efforts for the 303-mile Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) right-of-way and started the monitoring and mitigation phase. We restored the right-of-way using native seed mixes that are beneficial for pollinators and wildlife, successfully revegetating approximately 100 miles of the pipeline project.

EQT, through the MVP project, has also committed to planting 131 acres of bare root saplings to reduce the permanent impact of the project in sensitive areas such as U.S. Forest Service lands, culturally significant areas, stream riparian areas, and forested wetlands. To date, EQT has completed 123 acres of the tree planting and will continue to monitor the success of those plantings for at least 2 years. In addition to these tree plantings, EQT is also working to maintain healthy ecosystems for wildlife by tracking water quality parameters at select streams in proximity to endangered species and bat activity at locations where they are known to hibernate.

Surveys and Permitting

SASB EM-MD-160a.1
Description of environmental management policies and practices for active operations
SASB EM-MD-160a.1

Prior to site development, we assess each potential site and pipeline route, as well as associated workspaces and access roads, for biodiversity risks. Our biodiversity risk assessments follow the mitigation hierarchy to allow us to safely begin construction while avoiding or minimizing impacts on ecological resources. Where avoidance is not possible, we work with appropriate regulatory agencies on mitigation plans. We focus on avoidance and minimization of impacts during site selection, pipeline routing, and project scope development. Working with third-party and internal experts, regulatory agencies, and landowners, we consider safe and environmentally responsible construction and development practices through methods listed below.

  • We complete desktop and field studies to identify and avoid aquatic resources or, when necessary, determine the most appropriate crossing location and method to minimize impacts. When impacts cannot be avoided, we work with regulatory agencies on appropriate mitigation measures such as riparian plantings or wetland monitoring;
  • We use evaluation of historical landslide mapping and slope modeling to assess site and slope stability and erosion potential, which we then use to design necessary controls to minimize risk and manage potential erosion and stormwater runoff; and
  • We utilize various domestic environmental registries such as the Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Information for Planning and Construction tool to identify potential impacts to threatened, endangered, and special concern species or resources near proposed areas of operation. We also conduct habitat assessments and presence/absence surveys in coordination with the U.S. FWS and state wildlife resource agencies to determine potential impacts to threatened or endangered species. Bats, clams, and various plant species are the most common federally identified endangered species found within our operating areas. If we identify a threatened or endangered species, we make it a priority to avoid disturbing these species and habitats. Where this is not possible, we work with appropriate federal and state agencies to develop and execute protection plans. Plans can include implementation of artificial structures such as bat boxes, artificial bark, and species relocation, if required.

Ongoing Monitoring of Active Sites

SASB EM-EP-160a.1
Description of environmental management policies and practices for active sites
SASB EM-MD-160a.1
Description of environmental management policies and practices for active operations
SASB EM-EP-160a.1
SASB EM-MD-160a.1

Once a site is in development, we continuously monitor for biodiversity and land impacts. Our site-specific environmental management plans align with stringent local regulatory requirements and often apply standards that exceed those required by law. Our management plans detail the site-specific actions to be taken in the event of an incident and include:

  • Erosion and sedimentation control, stormwater management, and site restoration;
  • Spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plans;
  • Preparedness, prevention, and contingency plans;
  • Groundwater protection plans; and
  • Other topics applicable to the site.

For sites where we identified and relocated endangered species, we continue to monitor species’ health in their new environment for up to two years, or longer if determined through consultation with regulatory agencies. Until we achieve adequate site stabilization, we conduct weekly and post-rainfall inspections, documenting the condition of the site, and noting any stabilization issues, spills, or site damage.

We report identified issues to our EHS team, which sends a maintenance crew to address the issue on a priority schedule based on criticality. Given the nature of the issue, our EHS team also coordinates with our SP&C team. Additionally, we use our digital work environment to report issues and promptly notify the relevant response teams.

Decommissioning and Inactive Sites

Once site operations are complete, to maintain positive relationships with landowners and communities, we work with property owners to restore their land — as closely as possible — to its original condition. We reestablish contours close to the original land contours and revegetate with state-approved seed mixes, native seed mixes, and/or vegetation requested by landowners. We also commonly accommodate agency requests to use specialized seed mixes (e.g., pollinator mixes) and landowner requests for topsoil segregation. These techniques support local flora and fauna by allowing wildlife movement, restoration of the habitat, and prevention of invasive species. We implement habitat mitigation projects based on site-specific conditions or requirements, such as bat box installation and riparian planting. When sites, rights-of-way, associated workspaces, and access roads are adequately restored, we work with regulatory agencies to confirm restoration success according to state requirements and then request termination of applicable permits.

We are also focused on restoration activities beyond what is required for our projects. Every year since 2021, we have undertaken a two-day tree planting event around Earth Day to reforest areas affected by our activities. This event allows employees to directly participate in our positive impacts on the ecosystem and encourages them to be part of our overall reclamation efforts. In 2024, our volunteers planted over 1,000 trees.


How We Are Doing

[1] We use U.S Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Geological Survey data to identify protected wetlands and land areas of high biodiversity (Source: “Download Seamless Wetlands Data by State,” U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024): https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/State-Downloads.html and USGS: https://www.usgs.gov/). We have certain leases that allow us to drill and develop deep shale formations outside of our primary operating areas in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio. The numbers provided in this table exclude acreage above such leased deep formation development rights located in states other than Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio as we do not currently drill these deep formation rights in states other than Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio nor do we have plans to develop these deep formation rights within the next 5 years.

How We Are Doing

GRI 3-3
Management of material topic
GRI 304-1
11.4.2
Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas
GRI 304-3
11.4.4
Habitats protected or restored
GRI 304-4
11.4.5
International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations
SASB EM-EP-160a.3
Percentage of (1) proved and (2) probable reserves in or near sites with protected conservation status or endangered species habitat
SASB EM-MD-160a.2
Percentage of land owned, leased, or operated within areas of protected conservation status or endangered species habitat
GRI 3-3
GRI 304-1
GRI 304-3
GRI 304-4
SASB EM-EP-160a.3
SASB EM-MD-160a.2

We seek to prevent significant incidents with best management practices to assess, monitor, and mitigate potential or actual impacts on biodiversity and land. Failure to do so can result in environmental violations, which we track closely to evaluate our performance. A significant violation could prevent our future access to permits and associated license to operate, therefore we measure our notice of violation rate and implement measures to proactively prevent violations.

In 2024, we received 92 notices of violations (NOVs) associated with biodiversity and land, which includes NOVs received for incidents where waterways or land were potentially impacted. This increased number of NOVs in 2024 was partially due to the increased amount of assets we managed following the acquisition of the Equitrans Assets in July 2024. We will continue to follow our best management practices as we work to prevent and mitigate potential incidents in the future.

We also carefully track impacts on biodiversity and habitats. The table below shows the percentage of production reserves near protected areas.

2024 Proved and Probable Reserves in or Near Protected Areas

Metric 

2024

Proved reserves in or near sites with protected conservation status or endangered species habitat[1]

65.0%

Probable reserves in or near sites with protected conservation status or endangered species habitat[2]

66.7%

We also closely track and identify threatened and endangered species within our core operating area. Seventeen endangered species and seven threatened species occupy habitats within our core operating area, covering Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, as well as in Virginia where we acquired assets in 2024. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act protects certain species of birds whose breeding grounds or seasonal habitats overlap with our core operating area and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act protects certain bird species which nest in the area. The following table summarizes the species of concern located within our general operating area.

2024 U.S. FWS Threatened and Endangered Species — Operating Area

 

Animal

Plant

Endangered

  • Clubshell clam
  • Fanshell clam
  • James spinymussel
  • Northern riffleshell clam
  • Pink mucket clam
  • Rayed bean clam
  • Sheepnose clam
  • Snuffbox clam
  • Spectaclecase clam
  • Gray bat
  • Indiana bat
  • Northern long eared bat
  • Candy darter
  • Diamond darter
  • Roanoke longperch
  • Northeastern bulrush
  • Peter’s mountain mallow

Threatened

  • Longsolid clam
  • Round hickory nut clam
  • Eastern massasauga
  • Atlantic pigtoe
  • Small whorled pogonia
  • Smooth coneflower
  • Virginia spirea

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

  • Bald Eagle
  • Golden Eagle
  • None

We have implemented several monitoring and mitigation projects as part of the construction and ongoing operation of the MVP. For example, we placed acoustic monitors at the entrances of two caves in the project area to monitor bat activity prior to the start of construction in 2023 and they will remain in place for two hibernating seasons. We plan to use the acoustic monitoring data to identify and evaluate bats using the caves and a report will be provided to the U.S. FWS summarizing the data.

In addition, we continue to use monitoring stations at U.S. FWS and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved locations upstream, downstream, and in each tributary of aquatic species impact areas for the MVP that U.S. FWS concluded could potentially create an impact area for aquatic species. We have used these stations to detect any measurable levels of project-related sediment entering listed aquatic species streams. Upon the commissioning of each station, third-party consultants began receiving and analyzing the data, performing field visits to evaluate the source of any elevated sediment concentrations detected, and reporting results to U.S. FWS and FERC. Monitoring will continue for approximately one year after the MVP’s 2024 in-service date.

We continuously work to improve our biodiversity and land protection processes in alignment with regulatory requirements and industry best practices, as informed by the Marcellus Shale Coalition. We use a benchmark established by our SP&C team to better understand how quickly we address and solve biodiversity issues identified by monitoring crews. The team uses benchmarking data to better define priority levels and identify solutions that enable our maintenance teams to respond to issues more efficiently.

We continue to explore additional opportunities to minimize our biodiversity and land impacts. As described in Water, we are connecting more sites with water pipelines, thereby eliminating unnecessary water impoundments and reducing road traffic from water hauling. Our combo-development strategy also helps us achieve our production volume target with fewer drilling sites. For every site we eliminate, we estimate we will prevent 40 to 50 acres of tree removal and grading and reduce associated road impacts.

[1] Calculated based on the location of protected areas (with a 5-kilometer buffer around such locations) identified on the U.S. Geological Survey map (Source: USGS: https://maps.usgs.gov/padus/), and surveys maintained by Protected Planet (Source: “Protected Areas (WDPA),” Protected Planet: https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA) and the National Audubon Society (Source: “Many of America’s most beloved and biologically rich landscapes are in grave danger,” Audubon: https://www.audubon.org/important-bird-areas), mapped against the location of EQT’s proved reserves.

[2] Calculated based on the location of protected areas (with a 5-kilometer buffer around such locations) identified on the U.S. Geological Survey map (Source: USGS: https://maps.usgs.gov/padus/), and surveys maintained by Protected Planet (Source: “Protected Areas (WDPA),” Protected Planet: https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA) and the National Audubon Society (Source: “Many of America’s most beloved and biologically rich landscapes are in grave danger,” Audubon: https://www.audubon.org/important-bird-areas), mapped against the location of EQT’s probable reserves.

Close button for share
SHARE